May 202013
 

Yahoo JapanThe call has gone out to Yahoo Japan’s 200 million users to change their passwords, after the company warned that it suspected hackers had managed to access a file containing 22 million user IDs.

Yahoo Japan says that it detected an attempt to gain unauthorised access to its administrative systems on Thursday at approximately 9pm local time.

Although the information taken from Yahoo Japan’s servers is said not to contain passwords, or other personal identifying information required to hijack an account (such as the answers to secret questions), the site has decided that users should reset their passwords regardless.

In a press statement published on Yahoo Japan’s website, the number one search engine in Japan stressed that it had not confirmed that the data had definitely leaked to the outside world, but that it deeply apologised for any inconvenience caused.

Yahoo Japan statement

Fingers crossed, only user IDs were exposed during the security breach and nothing more serious. But even user IDs should be private, and kept out of the hands of cybercriminals.

Potentially, online criminals now have a database of 22 million Yahoo Japan email addresses – and there are surely slimebags out there who would get a real kick out of spewing out a spam campaign, sending a phishing attack to Yahoo users, posing as a legitimate email from the company, or launching a targeted malware attack.

Hopefully Yahoo Japan will be investigating how the security breach occurred, and putting strong defences in place to prevent it – or anything worse – happening in future.

Article source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/nakedsecurity/~3/TdiK72RqmCg/

May 202013
 

Judge's gavel image courtesy of ShutterstockJeffrey Beall, a US academic librarian who uses his Scholarly Open Access blog to write about publishers’ dubious practices, is being threatened with a $1 billion lawsuit by an Indian publishing group.

Beall keeps a running list, known as “Beall’s list,” of journals and publishers who do fishy things such as spamming scholars or charging bogus fees.

As Ars Technica’s Nathan Mattise tells it, Beall’s work has earned him notice from the likes of the New York Times.

In an April 7 article, the NYT tells of one such fishy scheme in the “exploding world of pseudo academia.”

After signing up for what they thought was a prestigious entomology conference, scientists recruited for “Entomology-2013″ (lose the hyphen and you’ve got the name of a legitimate, academically sanctioned conference) found that they had been recruited by email, as opposed to being vetted by leading academics.

To add insult to injury, those who agreed to appear were charged “a hefty fee” for the privilege of appearing on a podium and being able to pad their resume with the negligible accomplishment, according to the NYT.

It’s one example of “a parallel world of pseudo-academia, complete with prestigiously titled conferences and journals that sponsor them,” the NYT’s Ginan Kolata reports, with many journals and meetings adopting names that are “nearly identical to those of established, well-known publications and events.”

Usher in Beall, the watchdog who keeps tabs on the publishing end of this predatory phenomenon.

Beall maintains a blacklist of what he calls “predatory open-access journals.”

The list enumerated 20 publishers in 2010 and has since grown to more than 300.

Speaking with the NYT, Beall estimated at least 25 percent of the total number of open-access journals published today are predatory—as many as 4,000.

In fact, a clear example of predatory publishers’ spamming ways are emails Beall gets from publishers asking to be added to his list of predators.

Beall writes here about one such email, wherein a correspondent who describes himself as “a internee for International Journal of Biology” asks that the journal be listed.

Beall investigated this one in particular and found deceit:

“The new journal [claims to have] ‘published’ four issues, but upon closer examination, it really hasn’t. It’s a ruse. Among the four issues, there are only six articles. At least some of them are copied from the former BioMed Central (BMC) journal called the Journal of Biology. In 2010, this journal merged with BMC Biology, and the merged journal is called BMC Biology.”

“The publisher of the new journal has taken previously-published articles and edited them, changing some of the words, and published them as new original articles in the journal.”

It is this kind of detective work that’s raised the ire of the OMICS Publishing Group, based in India.

Lawsuit image courtesy of ShutterstockAccording to the Chronicle of Higher Education, Beall on Tuesday received a letter from an IP management firm’s lawyer, warning him that he could be imprisoned for up to three years under India’s Information Technology Act.

Beall has accused OMICS of spamming scholars with invitations to publish, quickly accepting their papers, then charging them a nearly $3,000 publishing fee after accepting a paper.

The Chronicle of Higher Education calls the six-page letter “rambling”.

In the letter, the IP management firm calls Beall’s blog “ridiculous, baseless, impertinent,” and says that it “smacks of literal unprofessionalism and arrogance.”

Here’s an excerpt, all nonstandard English being sic:

“All the allegation that you have mentioned in your blog are nothing more than fantastic figment of your imagination by you and the purpose of writing this blog seems to be a deliberate attempt to defame our client. … Our client perceive the blog as mindless rattle of a incoherent person and please be assured that our client has taken a very serious note of the language, tone, and tenure adopted by you as well as the criminal acts of putting the same on the Internet.”

Is Beall in danger?

In India, Section 66A of the Information Technology Act makes it illegal to use a computer to publish “any information that is grossly offensive or has menacing character” or to publish false information. The punishment can, in fact, be as much as three years in prison.

According to the Chronicle, were the lawsuit to go forward, Beall would likely win in a US court, if the statements on his blog are in fact true. Were the suit filed in India, the situation gets hazier.

As it is, Section 66A has led to public pushback in India, which in turn has led to the government modifying the law such that complaints must now first be approved by a police deputy commissioner or inspector general.

If the suit does go to litigation, will Beall be looking at paying the Dr. Evil-ish sum of one billion dollars?

Beall thinks the idea is “silly”:

“The amount is silly—I haven’t done any damage to their operation. … The case has no merit, in my opinion.”

Good luck with the situation, Mr. Beall.

May you and other watchdogs not get hounded into silence by vindictive litigation, which this certainly sounds to me like it might be.


Images of lawsuit papers and gavel courtesy of Shutterstock.

Article source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/nakedsecurity/~3/R3Y5fstFH18/

May 202013
 

A Chinese hacking team responsible for attacks on numerous US companies has resumed its harmful cyber campaign.

A number of unnamed government security experts and officials confirmed that the hackers had restarted their attacks on Sunday, following a three-month period of inactivity, the New York Times (NYT) reported. The team is reportedly the same one detailed in a report from security firm Mandiant earlier this year.

Mandiant claimed to have linked a branch of the Chinese military codenamed Unit 61398 to the APT1 cyber-espionage campaign in February. The unit is based in Shanghai and is estimated to have mounted attacks on over 141 companies.

The identity of the campaign’s victims remains unknown, though the NYT claims the attacks are hitting a number of US companies and are designed both for basic espionage and intellectual property theft. At the time of publishing Mandiant, the US Embassy in London and the White House had not responded to V3‘s request for comment on the report.

The US Department of Defense reported detecting several attacks on businesses involved in critical infrastructure areas stemming from China in its Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China 2013 report to Congress earlier in May. The Chinese government has always denied the allegations, saying cyber attacks are a global issue facing all countries.

Sophos security expert, Graham Cluley, told V3 that while news that the team has resumed its activities is troubling, firms should not overreact, as attacks of this nature are now an everyday occurrence, with nearly every government in the world mounting similar campaigns.

“Government departments, military contractors and international companies working on sensitive deals need to be aware that cyber espionage is a reality, and there may be remote hackers interested in breaking into your systems and snooping on your data and communications,” he said.

“It would be wrong to assume that Chinese hackers were the only ones involved in attacks like this, of course. They’re all at it. I would be surprised if any developed nation wasn’t involved in some level of internet espionage. After all, it’s relatively easy to do and a low risk compared to having spies on the ground. Of course, the problem is always proving a particular attack was state-sponsored rather than being done by lone hackers of their own choosing.”

Cluley said that the number of government-funded cyber attacks will undoubtedly increase in the coming years and that firms must update their defences to address the growing threat.

“As more and more data is entrusted to computers, it becomes ever more attractive for those interested in accessing the data to target those networks,” he said.

“In fact, I’d be disappointed if our security services were wasting budget parachuting in spies with James Bond gadgets to steal info when they could just write some spyware and email it to our enemies.

“The best defence? A mixture of training your staff, layer protection at desktops, gateways and servers, keeping up to date with patches to reduce exposure to potential exploits.”

F-Secure researcher, Sean Sullivan mirrored Cluley’s sentiment, saying IT managers should not overreact to the threat.

“I wouldn’t say that firms should be worried to the point of panic – but I would advise that they listen to their IT managers’ concerns. IT security has always been a bit of a budget battle. Good IT management often requires good ‘political’ skills in order to convince upper management to pay for what’s needed,” he said.

The comments echo those of numerous other security experts. McAfee vice president, Ross Allen and Symantec chief technology officer Darren Thomson urged businesses to take a measured approach to the cyber threat they face during a panel discussion at the Trustmarque conference in London.

Article source: http://www.v3.co.uk/v3-uk/news/2269159/chinese-military-unit-resumes-cyber-attacks-on-us-businesses

 Posted by at 3:59 pm
May 202013
 

2. Use different passwords on different sites With individuals typically having anything up to 100 online accounts, the tendency has become to share one or two passwords across accounts or use very simple ones, such as loved ones’ names, first pets or favourite sports teams. Indeed, research by Ofcom last month revealed that over half of UK adults (55%) use the same passwords for most, if not all, websites they visit, while one in four (26%) use birthdays or names as passwords. Any word found in the dictionary is easily crackable. Instead, says Sian John, online security consultant at Symantec, have one memorable phrase or a line from a favourite song or poem. For example: “The Observer is a Sunday newspaper” becomes “toiasn”. Add numerals and a special character thus: “T0!asn”. Now for every site you log on to, add the first and last letter of that site to the start and end of the phrase, so the password for Amazon would be “AT0!asnn”. At first glance, unguessable. But for you, still memorable.”

Article source: http://gulfnews.com/business/technology/the-20-commandmants-of-online-safety-1.1185853

 Posted by at 9:59 am
May 202013
 

fffwinners

Two for the price of one – it’s everyone’s favourite supermarket offer, but it’s also what we’ve got on our hands now that the Fittest Fundraiser competition is over. See, we’ve walked away with two worthy winners instead of just the one. That means we’ve got twice the amount of miles to cover, and twice as much chance to raise a huge amount of cash with JustTextGiving.

Ready? Let’s meet our winners…

Sophie Mullins

sophieAfter starting running in 2008, and quickly going from amateur local pro, Sophie has recently completed her first competitive run after spending nearly two years battling illness. “I’ve got a condition called Mastocytosis,” she explains, “which I was finally diagnosed with in June last year. At that time I was too ill to do anything – I was struggling to even walk a couple of hundred metres.

“I was given the diagnosis that not only would I never run again, but I should never run again. The condition means I have too many mast cells, and they’re very unstable, so there’s lots of things that can cause them to destabilise. When that happens they degranulate, and that’s like a massive allergic reaction.”

“I was too ill to do anything – I was struggling to walk a couple of hundred metres.”

But, thankfully, that’s not stopped Sophie – it’s only spurred her on more: “Now I’ve got medication and other means to keep it stabilised and run safely. I’m getting fast again now,” she says. “Or fast-ish! I’ve got to build my fitness back up but I’m feeling good.” We think she’s being modest – Sophie came second in her most recent outing.

Sophie’s raising money for Leukemia and Lymphoma Research, which aims to solve a problem she’s acutely aware of; suffering from Mastocytosis means she’s more susceptible developing to both illnesses.

“Being diagnosed with Mast Cell Leukemia sometimes only gives you about two or three months to live,” she explains. “I have a much higher chance than the rest of the population of developing it, but, putting that aside, I think it’s horrible that there’s a major cancer that there’s still no real treatment for.

“I want to raise money for charities that are going to use it for research into this, because they don’t often get the big pharmaceutical funding due to how rare these illnesses are.”

If you’d like to support Sophie’s worthy cause, you can text TINY81 and your chosen amount of money (for example, TINY81 £3) to 70070, to donate using JustTextGiving.

Grant Counsell

grant“My running background? Not very much, really!” says Grant, laughing. But in truth, he’s no stranger to long runs, even if the Fittest Fundraiser challenge is way bigger than anything he’s done in the past. “I’ve done a few fundraising things through work with a whole bunch of people,” he says. “We did the Manchester run last year, and we did the Great South Run three years ago for different charities.

“That’s the extent of my running career, if you want to call it that!” So why was he so keen to get involved with the Fittest Fundraisr competition? To try and raise as much money as possible for a cause that’s close to his heart:

“Three members of my family are affected with different types of cancer,” Grant explains, adding that he’s raising money for Cancer Research UK. “There’s nothing you can do about that in a way, but it’s about doing anything that I can, to do something positive that can help somebody else. That’s why I’m doing it.”

“Training’s going pretty well. I’m not worried about next weekend now…”

Luckily, Grant’s also got a bit of moral support along the way: “On some of the runs, some of my colleagues are coming with me as well. There’s six of us doing the Bupa Great Manchester run, two of us doing the Great North Run, and another colleague doing the Great South Run.

“Training’s going pretty well,” he adds. “I’m not worried about next weekend now – I’ve done a couple of ten milers, and have been training since the beginning of January. I’m not hugely worried about anything now.” Good news, because competing in seven of the UK’s biggest running events is no mean feat.

To support Grant and donate to Cancer Research, you can text RUGC80 and your chosen amount (for example, RUGC80 £3) to 70070, to donate using JustTextGiving.

Oh, and there’s one more member of the team…

Dan Bowsher

2ab8d2d9-3089-492f-8507-69ef4c16050eDan’s our man on the inside. He’s part of the Vodafone UK social team and, outside of work, he’s spent the best part of the last two and a half years getting into running and encouraging others to run with him to raise money for charity. All told, we thought he’d be a great candidate to take on the challenge too – not to mention contributing to the group’s social media know-how and running chat.

And, as he puts it, it’s a fantastic opportunity:

“I’m really looking forward to meeting Sophie and Grant and getting to know them – their Fittest Fundraiser applications were really strong and it’s great that both of them are involved. Getting through a series of events like this is as much about your support network throughout training as it is at the events – not to mention the JustTextGiving donations – and I’m sure there’s going to be lots we can learn from each other over the next few months.”

 

Claire Lomas cycling 5Keep on moving
We spoke to Claire Lomas to find out how charity sport events are changing.
Click here to find out the future of fundraising.

 

“I’m running for the James Hopkins Trust, which is a small, regional charity providing respite care for families of severely disabled and life-limited children in my hometown of Gloucester. I spent two months working with them last year and it’s great to be able to participate in the Fittest Fundraiser to support the amazing work they do.”

Ready to run? Our Fittest Fundraisers will be running seven of the Bupa Great Runs throughout 2013, and we’ll be following them every step of the way. For a full rundown of the events and more on the challenge at stake, click here.

Article source: http://blog.vodafone.co.uk/2013/05/20/fittest-fundraiser-winners-announced/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=fittest-fundraiser-winners-announced

 Posted by at 9:59 am
May 202013
 

Sluice gate at damControl systems for dams, industrial plants and building controls are increasingly being found online

I’m watching a live video feed of people visiting a cafe in London.

It’s a small, busy place and is doing a good trade in tea, coffee and cakes. That woman has dropped some money. A child is running around. Later, another customer thinks they have got the wrong change.

Nothing too gripping, you might think, except that the feed should be private, seen only by the cafe’s managers. Somebody forgot to click a box so now anyone who knows where to look can watch.

That CCTV feed is just one of many inadvertently put online. Finding them has got much easier thanks to search engines such as Shodan that scour the web for them. It catalogues hundreds every day.

“Shodan makes it easier to perform attacks that were historically difficult due to the rarity of the systems involved,” Alastair O’Neill from the Insecurety computer security research collective told the BBC. “Shodan lowers the cost of enumerating a network and looking for specific targets.”

It is not just CCTV that has been inadvertently exposed to public scrutiny. Search engines are revealing public interfaces to huge numbers of domestic, business and industrial systems.

Mr O’Neill and other researchers have found public control interfaces for heating systems, geo-thermal energy plants, building control systems and manufacturing plants.

Remote work

The most worrying examples are web-facing controls for “critical infrastructure” – water treatment systems, power plants and traffic control systems.

Industrial plantMany industrial systems are networked because they are in remote locations

“There’s a tremendous amount of stuff out there right now,” said Kyle Wilhoit, a threat researcher from Trend Micro who specialises in seeking out those exposed systems and helping them improve their defences.

Mr Wilhoit said such control systems, which often go by the name of Scada (supervisory control and data acquisition), get put online for many different reasons. Often, he said, the elements of such critical systems were in far-flung places and it was much cheaper to keep an eye on them via the internet than to send an engineer out.

It’s not just finding these systems that is a danger. Security experts are finding lots of holes in the software they run that, in the hands of a skilled attacker, can be exploited to grant unauthorised access.

“For attackers, the potential pay-off for compromising these systems is very high,” said Mr Wilhoit.

Governments are turning their attention to increasingly public vulnerabilities in such critical systems. The US Department of Homeland Security has established a computer emergency response team that deals solely with threats to industrial control systems. In the UK, government cash has been made available to help intelligence agencies and law enforcement deal with cyberthreats.

Continue reading the main story

Start Quote

“The threat is there – it might not be biting you yet but you had better be ready for the day it does”

End Quote
Jeff Parker
ICSPA

A Cabinet Office spokesman said cyber-attacks were one of the “top four” threats to the UK’s national security.

“Billions of pounds are being lost to the UK economy from cybercrime each year, including from intellectual property theft and cyber-espionage,” he said. “Industry is by far the biggest victim.”

The spokesman added that government was working with industry to harden critical infrastructure against attack, and had set up a series of initiatives to share information about threats and the best way to tackle them.

Bad decisions

The number of web-facing industrial and critical systems that these search engines find is only going to grow. That could introduce a whole new problem if the work of Greg Jones from security firm Digital Assurance is any guide.

Mr Jones bought several smart electricity meters from eBay and took them apart to see how well they protected the information within them. The models he bought are the same as those likely to be used as the UK converts its relatively dumb electricity grid to a smarter alternative.

A few days of work saw Mr Jones and his colleagues extract the passwords from the small chunk of memory inside the meter.

Warning textMany of the systems found by Shodan should have a restricted audience

“They had the same credentials in them – factory default passwords.” In addition, he said, basic steps to stop people fiddling with the hardware, or at least reveal tampering, had not been taken.

The traffic the devices swapped with utilities looked like it would be easy to spoof. If smart meters are rolled out in large numbers this could mean problems as it would give any attacker a way to trick that smart grid into making some catastrophically bad decisions.

“There are some really good standards out there governing smart meters,” said Mr Jones. “Our evidence suggests that those suggestions are not being followed.”

This is despite the government body that advises on security, based at GCHQ in Cheltenham, drawing up standards for validating the security, or otherwise, of the meters. The UK was already supposed to be well on the way to making the grid smarter but the project has been delayed because of worries about the central control system.

What is clear is that critical infrastructure and industrial plant control systems are coming under more scrutiny from both attackers and defenders.

That has its upside, said Jeff Parker, one of the directors at the ICSPA, which advises governments and businesses on cyber-protection.

“Is that a benefit? If it raises awareness of vulnerabilities, then, yes, it can help,” he said. However, it might take a lot of work to harden systems and ensure they were adequately protected.

“The threat is there,” he said, “It might not be biting you yet but you had better be ready for the day it does.”

Article source: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-22524274

 Posted by at 3:58 am
May 192013
 

It’s almost time for the annual AusCERT conference in Queensland, Australia.

And for everyone who’s asked, the answer is, “Yes! There’s a #sophospuzzle.”

And a Sophos AusSHIRT to go with it.

Over the past few years, the Sophos AusSHIRT Puzzle has become a something of an institution.

It’s also one of the coolest and most sought-after giveaways of the show.

(What am I saying? It’s the most sought-after giveway!)

For those who won’t be on Queensland’s Gold Coast later this week, we’ll also be publishing the puzzle for you to solve and enter online.

There are prizes, as usual: geeky toys at the show, and a bunch of T-shirts for those who solve it online.

In previous years, the puzzles typically had multiple stages, with the shirt decoding to a URL, and the URL taking you to the next level, and so on.

Many of you asked us to make the 2013 puzzle a little more self-contained, notably so that those who are attending the conference don’t need to spend hours on their computers working their way through it.

Instead of three stages, this year we’ve given the puzzle three dimensions (OK, technically it’s an isometric projection into two dimensions, but bear with us here), and just one stage.

So you can solve this puzzle straight from the shirt, using nothing but pencil, paper and intellect.

Of course, you can still throw some home-hacked scripts at the problem if you want: a little bit of brute force goes a long way, and you can leave your scripts running while you attend the conference parties.

We’ll fill in the real letters in the squares of the Rubik’s Cube when the puzzle proper starts. (No, the answer isn’t “UTM”. Well, not this answer, anyway.)

The real thing, complete with handy hints, will be published on Naked Security to coincide with the official opening of the conference, on the evening of Tuesday 21 May 2013, at 2013-05-21T18:00+10.

That’s 6pm Queensland time, 4pm Singapore time, 10am in Berlin, 9am in the UK, 4am in New York and 1am in California.

It’ll also be half past five in the morning in Newfoundland, and quarter to two in the afternoon in Kathmandu, for those of you who doubt the need to take fractional timezones into account when programming.

Just so you know, the puzzle is a cryptogram, which means that the letters on the cube have been scrambled using an encryption algorithm.

It’s a slightly wacky and unusual cipher, with both substitution and transposition, but the substitution always replaces each plaintext letter with the same encrypted letter.

So you shouldn’t need a computer to solve it.

As usual, you’ll be able to follow the puzzle on Twitter using the hashtag #sophospuzzle.

Sophos Australia will feed you hints on the @Sophos_ANZ Twitter feed, so follow the SophOz team for some extra help.

And I’ll be keeping a watchful eye on proceedings via @duckblog.

Hope you can join us online, even if you won’t be there to pick up a shirt!

Article source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/nakedsecurity/~3/raXCD6YL6Oo/

May 192013
 

It’s almost time for the annual AusCERT conference in Queensland, Australia.

And for everyone who’s asked, the answer is, “Yes! There’s a #sophospuzzle.”

And a Sophos AusSHIRT to go with it.

Over the past few years, the Sophos AusSHIRT Puzzle has become a something of an institution.

It’s also one of the coolest and most sought-after giveaways of the show.

(What am I saying? It’s the most sought-after giveway!)

For those who won’t be on Queensland’s Gold Coast later this week, we’ll also be publishing the puzzle for you to solve and enter online.

There are prizes, as usual: geeky toys at the show, and a bunch of T-shirts for those who solve it online.

In previous years, the puzzles typically had multiple stages, with the shirt decoding to a URL, and the URL taking you to the next level, and so on.

Many of you asked us to make the 2013 puzzle a little more self-contained, notably so that those who are attending the conference don’t need to spend hours on their computers working their way through it.

Instead of three stages, this year we’ve given the puzzle three dimensions (OK, technically it’s an isometric projection into two dimensions, but bear with us here), and just one stage.

So you can solve this puzzle straight from the shirt, using nothing but pencil, paper and intellect.

Of course, you can still throw some home-hacked scripts at the problem if you want: a little bit of brute force goes a long way, and you can leave your scripts running while you attend the conference parties.

We’ll fill in the real letters in the squares of the Rubik’s Cube when the puzzle proper starts. (No, the answer isn’t “UTM”. Well, not this answer, anyway.)

The real thing, complete with handy hints, will be published on Naked Security to coincide with the official opening of the conference, on the evening of Tuesday 21 May 2013, at 2013-05-21T18:00+10.

That’s 6pm Queensland time, 4pm Singapore time, 10am in Berlin, 9am in the UK, 4am in New York and 1am in California.

It’ll also be half past five in the morning in Newfoundland, and quarter to two in the afternoon in Kathmandu, for those of you who doubt the need to take fractional timezones into account when programming.

Just so you know, the puzzle is a cryptogram, which means that the letters on the cube have been scrambled using an encryption algorithm.

It’s a slightly wacky and unusual cipher, with both substitution and transposition, but the substitution always replaces each plaintext letter with the same encrypted letter.

So you shouldn’t need a computer to solve it.

As usual, you’ll be able to follow the puzzle on Twitter using the hashtag #sophospuzzle.

Sophos Australia will feed you hints on the @Sophos_ANZ Twitter feed, so follow the SophOz team for some extra help.

And I’ll be keeping a watchful eye on proceedings via @duckblog.

Hope you can join us online, even if you won’t be there to pick up a shirt!

Article source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/nakedsecurity/~3/ZHHh4kcdhvg/

May 192013
 

Cyber-crime incidents that are reported by the press are “just a snapshot” of what is actually happening, according to the government spy agency GCHQ’s director Sir Iain Lobban.

In an article entitled “Countering the cyber threat to business” in the spring edition of the Institute of Directors Big Policy journal, Lobban said: “Cyberspace is contested every day, every hour, every minute, every second.

Further reading

“From GCHQ’s vantage point, we have seen significant disruption to government systems – from malware picked up accidently from the internet but also from deliberate attacks. On average 33,000 malicious emails a month are blocked at the gateway to the Government Secure Intranet – they contain sophisticated malware, often sent by highly capable cyber criminals or by state sponsored groups,” he added.

Lobban went on to urge business directors to understand how the cyber threat can affect their organisations, stating that it wasn’t just an issue for the defence and security sector but for all firms.

He warned professional services firms’ that their proprietary client information is an attractive target, for example.

He went on to say that organisations may not immediately realise that they have been targeted, with data being copied without any sign that it has happened.

“The risk of not acting now is that, by the time you realise your defences have been breached, it will be too late and the damage will have been done,” he said.

“As technology becomes ever more affordable and available, it is open to a wide range of threat actors – states, criminals and hackers – to mount attacks which put at risk many millions of pounds of investment on a daily basis. If these attacks are left unchecked, they could have a devastating impact on the future earning potential of companies and the economic well-being of nations,” he added.

Lobban also warned that the “Ten Steps To Cyber Security” in the Cyber Security Guidance for Business booklet produced by the Communications Electronics Security Group (CESG), the Department for Business Innovation and Skills (BIS) and the Centre for the Protection of National Infrastructure (CPNI) last year, while still valid, may be becoming outdated.

“What was considered a sophisticated cyber-attack only a year ago might now be incorporated into a downloadable and easy-to-deploy internet application, requiring little or no expertise to use,” he warned.

Article source: http://www.computing.co.uk/ctg/news/2268919/cybercrime-reports-are-just-a-snapshot-says-gchq-chief

 Posted by at 3:50 am