Apr 302012
 

Like us on Facebook   

As well as developing products to help people protect their digital life, Kaspersky is also working with international policing organisations and governments including Interpol and UN to help fight cyber criminals, or as Kaspersky simply himself puts it: “Saving the World.”

IBTimes UK spoke to Kaspersky and his team of global security experts at the Info Security conference in London recently.

“It is like living in a detective story. We don’t need to read these books because we live there,” Kaspersky said when asked if this was a good time to be in the cyber security industry. He believes that it is more complicated now that at any other time in history, but it is going to get even more complicated.

Hooligans, vandals, kids

Kaspersky has been in the business a long time and when speaking about the hackers who were around when he began his business at the end of the 1980s, he describes them as “hooligans, vandals, kids.”

It was a decade ago that he began to see the rise of cybercrime, where hackers began to attack the system for financial benefit.

Now he says that cybercrime has moved on to such an extent he believes that most governments are engaged in developing some form of spyware. “I am pretty sure that governments develop espionage,” he said.

The situation now is much more complicated, but it is not the end of the story. “In ten years’ time we will remember [the] present time as ‘OK, that was easy.’”

Cybercrime is a multi-billion pound industry and some of the malware and viruses being created by these criminal gangs is among some of the most sophisticated software being developed anywhere in the world.  This means that that these gangs are willing to pay serious money to software engineers who can create these programs.

Eugene Kaspersky with Russian President Dmitry Medvedev at Kaspersky's Moscow offices.

Kaspersky is proud of his “collection” of cyber security experts who are located in dozens of countires around the globe, but we asked him if he felt some of the industry’s top minds may be swayed to the dark side by the lure of large piles of cash.  In response, Kas[persky says that there are three categories of people.

The first are people who find a wallet on the street and immediately hand it into the police, the second are people who find a wallet on the street and put it in their pockets, while the final category is people who see a wallet in other people's pocket and decide to steal it. He believes the final category are the people who will work for the criminal underworld, saying "it is a question of education, their family, maybe even the stars." He thinks money may corrupt people who belong to the second category, but he like to "collect from the first category."

Kaspersky also says that cyber criminals are very different from traditional criminals because at the first sign of a police raid, they will break down and begin cooperating immediately with the authorities. He points to the case of Hector Monsegur, aka Sabu, one of the most prominent members of Anonymous, who it was revealed had been informing on his Andonymous colleagues to the FBI for the six months.

David Jacoby, Senior Security Researcher with Kaspersky, last year carried out a year-long survey about cyber security and how companies are dealing with. He found that companies on a whole were trying to protect against everything at once rather than protecting themselves against specific threats.

He pointed out that every ten years or so there is a major security breach and that no matter what happens, something similar will happen in ten years' time. "I won't say that we are learning nothing from our previous experiences, but something is going on and I think we are focusing on the wrong things today. People are focusing too much on future threats."

He points to the last years attack on Sony's network which utilised a simple SQL Injection technique to steal the usernames, passwords, addresses and bank accounts.

Cyber security is like house work

When asked if they felt the security industry was winning against the cyber criminals, David Emm, Senior Regional Researcher UK for Kaspersky, compared their efforts to house work: "It's like house work. You do it this week, and you know you have to do it again next week, but you can't not do it, even though you know you'll have to do it again next week."

Jacoby believes the "state of mind" of the customer is vital to changing the way cyber security works. He believes that people wilfully circumvent the anti-virus software installed on their computer just so they can download a certain program.

One of the reasons why this is an on-going issue, is that there is no deterrent in place for someone who breaks the rules. In a enterprise environment, it is the IT manager who is blamed if something goes wrong, even though the end user was the one who installed the rogue program.

When speaking about the trend of consumerisation or bring-your-own-device (BYOD) where employees are being allowed to bring their own smartphones and tablets to use at work, Jacoby believes this does not represent as much of a threat as some believe, simply because people will protect their personal devices more.

"The phone or tablet they got from their company, they see that as a very personal [device], the PC or laptop, not so much. I will make sure that I always have this [phone or laptop] on me. I will make sure that no one can tamper with it,” Jacoby said.

“I think we’re coming into an era where the mindset of security is very important, not just technology, because we can solve and we have solved a lot of things with technology.”

Emms likens the situation to the introduction of the seatbelt. He said that it took nearly a generation for the wearing of a seatbelt to become the norm and he suspects a similar length of time will be needed before we see people taking the correct attitude towards cyber-security.

In a bid to solve this issue and get people thinking in the right way about security, Kaspersky sends its experts around the world to speak to companies, universities, primary and secondary schools as well as governments.

While Kaspersky has been battling cyber crime for the past 25 years, he has lost none of his passion for the job and will continue trying to save the world one PC at a time.

To report problems or to leave feedback about this article, e-mail:
To contact the editor, e-mail:

Article source: http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/articles/335100/20120430/kaspersky-malware-cybercrime-cyber-security-mindset.htm

 Posted by at 9:21 pm
Apr 302012
 

Wi-fi hazard

Wi-fi hazardA Google engineer, responsible for data from wireless WiFi networks via Street View cars, told colleagues as long ago as 2007 that the code was collecting private data including emails, text messages, browsing histories and passwords.

That’s the finding of a Federal Communications Commission (FCC) report which has now been made fully public.

Earlier this month Naked Security reported how the FCC had filed a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture against Google, fining the internet giant $25,000.

However, at the time the FCC’s report was highly redacted – not allowing the public to see the grisly details of precisely what had occurred.

That’s now changed, as Google has now posted a full uncensored version of the document in the interests of transparency.

FCC document - before and after redaction

FCC document - before and after redaction

According to the FCC’s report, a Google employee identified only as “Engineer Doe” told colleagues in 2007 and 2008 about the sensitive nature of the data being collected by the Street View mapping cars.

However, Google only admitted publicly that it had collected the data in May 2010, causing a tidalwave of criticism from regulators and privacy campaigners.

A Google spokesman told The Guardian that it hoped to move on from the ongoing privacy saga:

“We decided to voluntarily make the entire document available except for the names of individuals. While we disagree with some of the statements made in the document, we agree with the FCC’s conclusion that we did not break the law. We hope that we can now put this matter behind us.”

Earlier this month, the FCC fined Google $25,000 for willfully and repeatedly obstructing its investigation by withholding documents.

It has to be said, considering the privacy storm that came out of the Street View data breach, Google has got away remarkably lightly. For a company of Google’s size, a $25,000 fine is going to feel like a minor slap on the wrist.

Article source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/nakedsecurity/~3/feAmqBXXAv4/

Apr 302012
 

Nearly two-thirds (64 percent) of IT pros believe their organizations will be the target of a cyberattack in the next six months, and three out of five (61 percent) say the attack will come from hactivists.

That was one of the findings in cybersecurity firm
Bit9′s annual security survey released last week.

What’s surprising about the survey is the concern given to hacktivist attacks, Bit9 Chief Technology Officer Harry Sverdlove told TechNewsWorld — “even though Anonymous and hacktivist-type attacks represent a minority of actual attacks.”

Moreover, when the survey’s questions began to get more specific, a different set of worries began to emerge. For example, when asked about the types of attacks that concerned them most, nearly half (45 percent) the IT pros said malware and 17 percent said spear phishing–both methods commonly used in attacks by cybercriminals and nation states.

By contrast, hacktivist attack methods received low concern rankings from the respondents. Only 11 percent were concerned about distributed denial of service attacks (DDoS) and 4 percent by SQL injection assaults.

“Once we went a little deeper, they were really more concerned about the types of attacks and the data that is more the target of cybercrime and cyberespionage,” Sverdlove noted.

Healthcare Data At Risk

The U.S. healthcare industry is one of the most at risk for significant data breaches and one of the most likely to be targeted for its well of protected data, according to a recent report commissioned by
Kroll Advisory Solutions.

Only about a quarter of the healthcare professionals surveyed for the report were concerned about the financial consequences of data breaches on their organizations, Kroll also found.

“This is surprising, given the fact that breaches in the healthcare industry ultimately come at a higher overall price than the cost realized in the financial and retail sectors,” notes the report.

One reason so few healthcare data pros are concerned about the financial impact of data breaches could be linked to their short-term view of the problem. They’re blind to the long-term effects that some of these events can have, according to Brian Lapidus, senior vice president of Kroll Advisory Solutions.

One data breach had a “tail” that exceeded 10 years, Lapidus recalled, so the organization was dealing with the consequences of the event for more than a decade after it happened.

“People think of breaches in terms of the actual event, and they don’t think about the tail,” he told TechNewsWorld.

Security at healthcare organizations can also suffer from a preoccupation with compliance, he added. “Compliance isn’t necessarily a driver of security. It’s the beginning of it — not the end.”

Iranian Oil Depot Hit by Virus

Iran is starting to become to cyberwarriors what the Spanish Civil War was to the Wehrmacht.

Two years ago, that nation’s nuclear facilities were targeted by the Stuxnet worm, which knocked out 1,000 of the 9,000 centrifuges it uses to refine uranium.

Last week, the facility it uses to export 80 percent of its crude oil was targeted by a computer virus intended to disrupt operations there.

Little is known about this latest cyberattack on Iran’s infrastructure, but apparently it hasn’t done much damage yet. The facility on Kharg Island is still operational, and while some data was affected, Iranian authorities are saying no major damage was done.

The cyberattack on Iran came just days before the U.S. House of Representatives convened hearings in Washington, D.C., on “The Iranian Cyber Threat to the United States.”

At that forum, members of Congress were warned about possible cyberattacks on power and transportation systems in the United States.

The good news is that Iran is not as sophisticated in cyberwarfare as China or Russia, Frank J. Cilluffo, director of The George Washington University
Homeland Security Policy Institute said in testimony submitted to Congress.

However, there have been reports of Iran hooking up with Venezuela to launch cyberattacks on military and civilian targets — including nuclear power plants — in the United States, he noted.

Moreover, Iran has been willing in the past to outsource its dirty work to terrorist organizations, Cilluffo observed.

“There is little, if any, reason to think that Iran would hesitate to engage proxies to conduct cyberstrikes against perceived adversaries,” he said.

Breach Diary

April 23. Opponents of Texas Voter Photo ID law file brief alleging state’s attorney general exposed the Social Security Numbers of millions of voters when complying with a discovery request in the case. The disks containing the information were returned to the state by the attorneys requesting the information after the mistake was discovered.

April 25. Sixteen months after the fact, Cryptic Studios, a maker of massively multiplayer online role playing games, informs its users that one of its user databases was compromised in December 2010. “We have no evidence at this time that any data other than the account name, handle, and encrypted password were accessed for any user,” the company says.

April 26. UK’s Serious Organized Crime Agency, with FBI and U.S. Department of Justice, shuts down 36 websites trafficking in stolen payment card and online bank account details. SOCA estimates the raids will prevent more than US$811 million in potential fraud.

April 27. Iron Mountain (NYSE: IRM) and PwC reports that four in 10 (42 percent) European law firms did not know whether they had suffered a data breach in the previous three years.

Calendar of Events

May 2. Security of Patient Data. Webinar, 2 p.m. ET, sponsored by Kroll Advisory Solutions and Healthcare IT News.

August 20-23. Gartner (NYSE: IT) Catalyst Conference. San Diego, Calif. Early bird price (before June 23): $1,995. Standard price: $2,295.


Article source: http://www.technewsworld.com/story/What-Evil-Lurks-in-the-Hearts-of-Hactivists-74981.html

 Posted by at 3:21 pm
Apr 302012
 

Cryptic Studio logo

Cryptic Studio logoCryptic Studios—the studio behind online multiplayer role playing games such as Star Trek Online, City of Heroes, City of Villains, and Champions Online—suffered a user account database breach 16 months ago and is warning users about it now.

According to a notice the company posted to their site and emailed to affected users, the unauthorized access happened in December 2010, and warnings are only being issued now due to “increased security analysis”.

The breach exposed user account names, handles, and encrypted passwords that the intruder was able to crack, at least in part.

The game company reset the passwords for all the accounts that it thinks were stored in the affected databases, but they’re not even particularly sure about what the intruder did or didn’t get his/her hands on.

From their notice:

“While we have no evidence that any other information was taken by the intruder, it is possible that the intruder was able to access additional account information. If they did so, the first and last name, e-mail address, date of birth (if provided to Cryptic Studios), billing address, and the first six digits and the last four digits of credit cards registered on the site may have been accessed. We have no evidence at this time that any data other than the account name, handle, and encrypted password were accessed for any user.”

cryptic_partial_new_releasecryptic_partial_new_release

The investigation continues, and the company says it’s “taking even further action” to pump up systems and “redouble” its security vigilance and protections.

Unfortunately, that redoubled vigilance and protection doesn’t appear to include identity fraud protection for affected users.

The company is also reminding people to be wary of phishing expeditions that ask for personal or sensitive information, which Cryptic would never request.

From their notice:

“For your own security, we encourage you to be especially aware of e-mail and postal mail scams that ask for personal or sensitive information. Cryptic will not contact you in any way, including by e-mail, asking for your credit card number, social security number, or any other personally identifiable information. If you use the same password for other accounts, especially financial accounts or accounts with personal information, we strongly recommend that you change them.”

I don’t like to pick on a company when it’s down, but this all strikes me as a little feeble. I sent a note to Cryptic asking these questions:

  • Why has it taken 16 months to discover this breach?
  • Was there no security monitoring prior to the security analysis that discovered the breach?
  • Is this discovery the result of the first time Cryptic Studios has analyzed its logs or used the services of a security firm or product?
  • What specific type of encryption was used to protect passwords?
  • Will Cryptic use a stronger form of encryption following the intruder(s)’ success at cracking encrypted passwords?
  • Why hasn’t the company offered identity fraud protection for users?

If Cryptic gets back to me, I’ll post their answers in the comments section below.

Cryptic’s notice about this incident begins by assuring users that “your privacy and security is important.”

Let’s see Cryptic put their money where their mouth is. If appropriate, let’s see identity fraud protection provided for those who were affected.

After leaving a database open for 16 months, it seems like a reasonable expectation.

Article source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/nakedsecurity/~3/IMBOF8kYxRE/

Apr 302012
 

ACTA wars: two_stickmen_fighting

ACTA wars: two_stickmen_fightingIt is starting to feel like no matter how many rounds of criticism the Anti Counterfeiting Trade Agreement goes through, it just keeps bouncing back.

In recent weeks, institutional condemnation of ACTA appeared to reach critical mass. First, Member of the European Parliament David Martin released a recommendation that the Euro Parliament should reject the agreement.

This is a big deal. He’s the Rapporteur who is chairing the International Trade Committee that is tasked with deciding the fate of ACTA in the Parliament.

While he is aware of the importance of intellectual property as a ‘raw material’ in Europe, he still decided the civil liberty implications of ACTA outweigh any benefits the law brings for IP protection.

He has many criticisms, a few of the big ones include:

  1. ACTA treats physical counterfeit goods (like drugs) the same way as digital pirated goods, which is inappropriate when the risks they pose are wholly distinct.
  2. Broad drafting of terms in ACTA might lead to ambiguities in how they are applied. A good example is the meaning of piracy on a ‘commercial scale’, which remains undefined and open to wide interpretation.
  3. Requiring states to work with companies to develop enforcement mechanisms might see ISPs becoming internet police for IP piracy. Rightly, he sees privatising a function that should be overseen by courts as unacceptable.
  4. ACTA was negotiated in secret by an exclusive ‘coalition of the willing’ with a pro-IP agenda. This neglects multilateral interests of third parties who are still impacted by the law.

Since then, another EU heavyweight has added its voice to the anti-ACTA fight.

The European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS) released an opinion saying that widespread, indiscriminate monitoring of internet users to stop ‘trivial, small scale, not for profit infringement’ is disproportionate and breaches fundamental EU privacy rights.

They are also concerned about the lack of due process safeguards and absence of a presumption of innocence.

All this criticism has led many to believe ACTA is dead in the water.

EU_flags

EU_flagsHowever, the picture in Parliament is quite surprising, with very little separating the ACTA opposition from the supporters.

European Digital Rights (EDRI) has calculated that 52.5% of the Parliament opposes ACTA whilst 47.5% are still in favour.

They say this means only 20 MEPs need to be swayed either way for drastically different outcomes.

In terms of formal European legislative process, four committees are feeding opinions to the Parliament on ACTA. Currently two are still in favour, and two are against.

Add the extensive industry lobbying, spearheaded by the European Commission, to the mix, and it becomes really difficult to predict what will happen next.

For ACTA to pass, it has to be adopted as it stands or the Parliament must reject it. They cannot change terms. If they do, they still have to reject the current version and go back to the other signatories, like the US, Japan and Australia, to negotiate changes.

To my mind, the sheer volume of legitimate criticism should be clear grounds for rejecting the text entirely. However, the political wrangling is succeeding in keeping the agreement on the negotiation table.

EDRI has said the strength of the pro-ACTA lobbying effort is such that any complacency of the anti-ACTA movement could be fatal, and the text passing into law is still a real prospect.

With so much tussling going on, it seems calls of victory from either side are premature.

Image of EU flags courtesy of Shutterstock
Image of fighting cartoon figures courtesy of nakedsecurity.sophos.com

Article source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/nakedsecurity/~3/hb_SwsuaIes/

Apr 302012
 

SophosLabs has been intercepting an X-rated spam campaign, designed to promote hardcore porn websites.

Emails have been spammed out purporting to have an adult video attached, using a variety of names.

Subject lines used in pornographic spam campaign

Subject lines used in pornographic spam campaign

The subject lines can vary, but each has an HTML file attached with a woman’s name.

Juliet Morton represents new movie (JulietMorton.html)

Mona Fletcher returned with new movie (MonaFletcher.html)

Destiny Patterson shot unbelievable episode (DestinyPatterson.html)

Rachel Ruiz made fantastic video (RachelRuiz.html)

Destiny Ayala shows herself in clip (DestinyAyala.html)

Amber Nichols introduced her new video (AmberNichols.html)

The emails themselves are very basic, and are designed merely to lure unsuspecting recipients into clicking on the attached file.

Pornographic spam

Pornographic spam

If you do click on the attached file, however, your browser will be redirected to one of a series of pornographic websites.

Sites promoted by pornographic spam campaign

Sites promoted by pornographic spam campaign

Sophos products are blocking the spam messages, and are being updated to detect the attached files as Mal/JSRedir-K.

Remember to always be cautious of clicking on unsolicited attachments.

Clearly, having your browser visit a hardcore porn website could be hard to explain to your boss (or, indeed, your partner) – but aside from that the bad guys could easily redirect your browser to visit a website with malicious intentions to infect your computer too.

Article source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/nakedsecurity/~3/YHnGgMnCaW8/

Apr 302012
 

Cryptic Studio logo

Cryptic Studio logoCryptic Studios—the studio behind online multiplayer role playing games such as Star Trek Online, City of Heroes, City of Villains, and Champions Online—suffered a user account database breach 16 months ago and is warning users about it now.

According to a notice, the company posted on Wednesday and emailed affected users, stating the unauthorized access happened in December 2010, and warning are only being issued now due to “increased security analysis”.

The breach exposed user account names, handles, and encrypted passwords that the intruder was able to crack, at least in part.

The game company reset the passwords for all the accounts that it thinks were stored in the affected databases, but they’re not even particularly sure about what the intruder did or didn’t get his/her hands on.

From their notice:

“While we have no evidence that any other information was taken by the intruder, it is possible that the intruder was able to access additional account information. If they did so, the first and last name, e-mail address, date of birth (if provided to Cryptic Studios), billing address, and the first six digits and the last four digits of credit cards registered on the site may have been accessed. We have no evidence at this time that any data other than the account name, handle, and encrypted password were accessed for any user.”

cryptic_partial_new_releasecryptic_partial_new_release

The investigation continues, and the company says it’s “taking even further action” to pump up systems and “redouble” its security vigilance and protections.

Unfortunately, that redoubled vigilance and protection doesn’t appear to include identity fraud protection for affected users.

The company is also reminding people to be wary of phishing expeditions that ask for personal or sensitive information, which Cryptic would never request.

From their notice:

“For your own security, we encourage you to be especially aware of e-mail and postal mail scams that ask for personal or sensitive information. Cryptic will not contact you in any way, including by e-mail, asking for your credit card number, social security number, or any other personally identifiable information. If you use the same password for other accounts, especially financial accounts or accounts with personal information, we strongly recommend that you change them.”

I don’t like to pick on a company when it’s down, but this all strikes me as a little feeble. I sent a note to Cryptic asking these questions:

  • Why has it taken 16 months to discover this breach?
  • Was there no security monitoring prior to the security analysis that discovered the breach?
  • Is this discovery the result of the first time Cryptic Studios has analyzed its logs or used the services of a security firm or product?
  • What specific type of encryption was used to protect passwords?
  • Will Cryptic use a stronger form of encryption following the intruder(s)’ success at cracking encrypted passwords?
  • Why hasn’t the company offered identity fraud protection for users?

If Cryptic gets back to me, I’ll post their answers in the comments section below.

Cryptic’s notice about this incident begins by assuring users that “your privacy and security is important.”

Let’s see Cryptic put their money where their mouth is. If appropriate, let’s see identity fraud protection provided for those who were affected.

After leaving a database open for 16 months, it seems like a reasonable expectation.

Article source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/nakedsecurity/~3/IMBOF8kYxRE/

SSCC 89

 Anti-Virus  Comments Off
Apr 302012
 

Sophos Security Chet Chat logo

Sophos Security Chet Chat logoAfter returning from BSides Austin for one day, I headed off to InfoSec Europe 2012 in London, UK. As the show was wrapping up Chris Pace and I recorded a short Chet Chat from the show floor.

As we strolled around the exhibition hall, I asked Chris what themes he thought were the hallmark of this year’s conference. Chris observed it might be easier to get an iPad here than in an Apple store considering how many stands were raffling off iPads.

We agreed the overwhelming topic at most stands was mobile device management and advanced persistent threats (APTs).

Mobile management is a serious problem for many organizations and it was interesting to see how different security companies are approaching the problem.

APTs on the other hand seem to be a seriously misunderstood topic. How a product can stop a technique or group that can use any tactic under the sun is beyond me, but many claim to be selling silver bullets when in reality they are simply trying to use fear to move products.

We had a bit of fun discussing the other stands at the show, but really were saving the best for last. Chris and our colleague Graeme Stewart had a contest at the Sophos stand for people to bring the most ridiculous tat/schwag/giveaways to our stand for a chance to trade it in for a bottle of champagne.

The contest was a huge success with the winners including a condom, a shredded hard drive and a plastic light-saber.

(26 April 2012, duration 5:52 minutes, size 3.5 MBytes)

You can also download this podcast directly in MP3 format: Sophos Security Chet Chat 89, subscribe on iTunes or our RSS feed. You can see all of the Sophos Podcasts by visiting our archive.

Article source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/nakedsecurity/~3/ikSNOllhheM/

Apr 292012
 

Yahoo!’s patent battle with Facebook is getting nastier.

In court papers filed on Friday, Yahoo! Inc expanded its six-week-old lawsuit against Facebook to include more allegations of intellectual property theft.

Yahoo! says Facebook’s social network infringes 12 of its internet patents. That’s up from 10 alleged patent violations previously.

Yahoo! also denied allegations that it has been infringing on 10 of Facebook’s patents and accused its rival of engaging in shady behaviour.

Among other things, Yahoo! says Facebook violated an agreement between the companies to notify each other of possible patent infringements before filing a court claim.

The acrimony is spilling out as Facebook Inc is preparing to raise $US5 billion ($A4.84 billion) in an initial public offering of stock that is expected to be the richest in Silicon Valley history.

Article source: http://news.ninemsn.com/technology/8458577/yahoo-escalates-facebook-patent-battle

 Posted by at 3:19 am
Apr 282012
 

HARRISBURG – Gov. Tom Corbett recently spoke at the National Cyber-Forensics and Training Alliance luncheon forum about the growing need for government, industry and law enforcement to work together against cybercrimes.

“It is important that the messages of this new century not be drowned out by a combination of senseless abuse and criminal misbehavior,” Corbett said. “Just as a superhighway can carry essential goods to market, along with criminals fleeing the scene of the crime, the Internet is much in need of traffic cops.”

The forum, held at Heinz Field, brought together a variety of government and industry officials sharing insight into how such a partnership in the fight against cybercrime will help protect global, state and local economic interests.

“We can’t afford to allow the bad guys to flee across national boundaries. If cyber-security is to mean anything, it must be an international effort,” Corbett said. “An email doesn’t stop at the border to clear customs. A financial transaction can’t pause to be searched. Things now move instantly, meaning we need to be on guard against those who would steal or terrorize at the same rate.”

In addition to Corbett, also speaking at the event were Philip Barton, deputy head of the British Embassy in Washington, D.C.; Sir Ian Andrews, chairman of the U.K.’s Serious Organised Crime Agency; and William G. Ross of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security.

The event also marked the expansion of an existing partnership with the U.K.’s Serious Organised Crime Agency, which has assigned an officer in Pittsburgh, as well as recognizing the strong trade relationship between the U.K. and Pennsylvania.

The NCFTA held the forum in conjunction with the Allegheny Conference on Community Development, Pittsburgh Technology Council, U.K. Trade and Investment and the World Affairs Council of Pittsburgh.

For more information, visit www.pa.gov.

Article source: http://gantdaily.com/2012/04/28/corbett-highlights-collaboration-in-battling-cybercrime/

 Posted by at 3:18 pm