Feb 292012
 

The rise of big data

The rise of big data, Schneier declared, is inevitable due to the cost of saving data being so cheap. “It’s easy and cheaper to search than sort”, he said. “The collection of data is being aggravated – mainly so the companies doing it can make more money… Companies like Apple, Amazon and Google are all competing to be the company that monetises your data”.

Schneier spoke of the lack of control that users have over their smartphones and portable devices. “I can’t do things as a security professional on my iPhone. Apple doesn’t give me the same access control that I have on my personal computer”, he said.

Ill-conceived regulations from law enforcement

Schneier named ‘Ill-conceived regulations from law enforcement’ the second biggest risk. “Mostly, what they propose is dumb”, he declared. “There is an honest desire to make the internet safer”, but the tactics used in this quest “use fear to pass legislations”. Schneier also denounced companies that use manipulation to encourage a law which serves their business model.

His advice to protect your privacy online included using skype and securing data by deleting it.

“I worry that we’ll be forced to design an internet kill-switch – I imagine it as a big red switch on Obama’s desk. The problem is, I don’t trust it would be possible to make this only available to the President”.

Schneier also declared the concept of ‘no anonymity’ a more expensive, and less secure, proposal. “You can’t eliminate anonymity”, he stressed.

Cyberwar arms race

Schneier’s third and final security threat was what he terms ‘cyberwar arms race’, which he insisted is now in the early stages. “There’s a lot of hype about cyberwar. It’s talked about, worried about, and nations are preparing for it with both defensive and attack technologies.”

“The US is stock piling cyber weapons”, he declared, using HBGary as an example. “We are in the early years of a cyberarms race and it’s very destabilising. There is a lot of money in cyberarms at the moment and the results will be instability, more government control, more money poured into standards and less security for us all”, he said.

Schneier expressed concern that decisions regarding cyberarms are made at a lower-level, “when they should be the decision of Obama”.

Schneier confessed his early reluctance to buy-in to the concept of APT attacks, but admits, “I’ve come around to APT, and I now think it captures something really important. If they’re good, they never fail”.

Schneier concluded with his information security predictions for the near future:

  • The fundamental problem of security won’t go away
  • Less information security products sold to consumers and more sold to companies like Facebook
  • More government work
  • Increased secrecy

Schneier concluded his session with a plea to the audience: “We all need to get involved”. Oh, and a plug of his new book.

 

Article source: http://www.infosecurity-magazine.com/view/24200/rsa-2012-schneier-reveals-three-biggest-information-security-risks-in-2012-/

 Posted by at 12:57 pm
Feb 292012
 

Interpol’s website appears to have been the victim of a cyber-attack after the international police agency announced the arrests of 25 suspected members of the hacking activist group Anonymous in Europe and South America.

The website went down briefly on Tuesday as supporters of Anonymous made online claims that it had been targeted following the arrests in Argentina, Chile, Colombia and Spain. It was quickly back up and running but was loading slowly.

Interpol announced that the arrests had been made under the umbrella of Operation Unmask, which it said was launched in mid-February in the wake of a series of coordinated cyber-attacks originating from the four countries against targets including the Colombian defence ministry and presidential websites, a Chilean electricity company and Chile’s national library.

It added that the operation was carried out by authorities in the four countries under the aegis of Interpol’s Latin American Working Group of Experts on Information Technology (IT) Crime, which facilitates the sharing of intelligence between the states involved.

Around 250 items of IT equipment and mobile phones were also seized during searches of 40 premises across 15 cities, Interpol said. Payment cards and cash had also been seized as part of the investigation into the funding of illegal activities carried out by the suspected hackers, aged 17 to 40.

Bernd Rossbach, Interpol’s acting executive director of police services, said: “This operation shows that crime in the virtual world does have real consequences for those involved, and that the internet cannot be seen as a safe haven for criminal activity, no matter where it originates or where it is targeted.”

Cyber-attacks by hackers linked to Anonymous have become a fairly regular occurance. Earlier this month, they marked the one-year anniversary of the uprising in Bahrain by attacking Combined Systems, a tactical weapons company that has been accused of selling tear gas canisters and grenades to Arab governments. Anonymous said the attack was in retaliation for sales by the company of chemical weapons “to repress our revolutionary movements”.

Also earlier this month, a leak by the hacking group of an 18-minute discussion between members of the FBI and the Metropolitan police embarrassed authorities and raised questions over how security was breached.

The call revealed officers discussing the delay of court proceedings against two alleged members of the LulzSec hacking group, which attacked a number of sites in 2011 including the US Congress and the UK’s Serious Organised Crime Agency.

Article source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2012/feb/29/interpol-website-cyber-attack?newsfeed=true

 Posted by at 12:57 pm
Feb 292012
 

/EINPresswire.com/ IT Governance Ltd, the global leader in ISO27001 and cybersecurity information, books and tools, warns that cyber attacks could be the largest threat to businesses this year.

It is a mandatory requirement for UK public sector organisations to inform the Information Commissioner’s Office of a data breach. Although the same legislation is not currently enforced in the UK private sector, commercial organisations are increasingly required to meet certain information security standards in order to win the trust of their customers and stakeholders and be able to tender for certain projects.

Advanced Persistent Threats (APTs) are a major concern for all company boards. APTs represent co-ordinated cyberactivities of sophisticated criminals and state level entities. APTs are usually targeted on specific government or private sector organisations (recently Google, Citigroup, the IMF and RSA) with the objective of stealing information or compromising information systems. The goal of an APT is not usually to bring down a business, but to stay embedded and to suck information out of it at a slow, undetected pace. Visit this page for more information: www.itgovernance.co.uk/Advanced-Persistent-Threats-APT.aspx.

Cyber attacks have become more sophisticated and some hacking groups such as ‘Anonymous’ have gone as far as to announce a successful hack on Twitter, sometimes before the victim organisation are aware themselves.

Given the presence of social media in our day-today lives, companies can no longer hide cyber attacks. As soon as a cyber attack is announced on Twitter, the media will ensure customers are aware.

Organisations shouldn’t try to ignore cyber threat, they should fight it. The best way to do this is to align their information security management system to ISO 27001 – the world’s only recognised cyber security management system standard. By not taking any action, the least organisations risk is negative publicity and loss of brand loyalty. More serious consequences include shareholder and financial losses. Read more information on the ISO27001 standard here: www.itgovernance.co.uk/iso27001.aspx.

To assist businesses with what can be a challenging ISO27001 project, the experts at IT Governance have designed the No3. ISO27001 Comprehensive Toolkit. It provides organisations with all the tools they will need for the implementation of an information security management system (ISMS). It includes copies of the three key standards (ISO27001, ISO27002 and ISO27005), the Risk Assessment Tool (vsRisk™), the Documentation Template Toolkit and manuals that describe in practical detail how each aspect of the ISMS should be tackled. A free demo of the toolkit can be downloaded from here: www.itgovernance.co.uk/products/718

One user of the Toolkit said: “Using the templates was the only way that we could deliver a first edition ISMS in under six months. Our deliverable was a work in progress, but miles ahead of where they would have been without the templates”.

Organisations who buy the No3. ISO27001 Comprehensive Toolkit before 29 February will receive the ICT Strategy Toolkit free. The ICT Strategy Toolkit will guide any organisation through the process of creating an ICT strategy, helping it drive down costs and control risk within an ICT environment.

Organisations can purchase the ISO 27001 Comprehensive Toolkit here: www.itgovernance.co.uk/products/718. Orders can also be made directly with the friendly, helpful IT Governance service centre team on telephone number +44 (0)845 070 1750. Larger organisations can make purchases with a purchase order, either by telephone, or by e-mail to servicecentre@itgovernance.co.uk.

– Ends -


FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
Desi Aleksandrova Marketing Executive
+44 (0) 845 070 1750
daleksandrova@itgovernance.co.uk
NOTES TO EDITORS

IT Governance Ltd is the one-stop-shop for books, tools, training and consultancy for governance, risk management and compliance. It is a leading authority on data security and IT governance for business and the public sector. IT Governance is ‘non-geek’, approaching IT issues from a non-technology background and talking to management in its own language. Its customer base spans Europe, the Americas, the Middle East and Asia. More information is available at www.itgovernance.co.uk.

Article source: http://www.einnews.com/pr-news/704523-an-iso27001-compliant-isms-helps-combat-cybercrime

 Posted by at 12:57 pm
Feb 292012
 

A HULL insurer is leading the world in the fight against cyber crime.

Marchant Mckechnie Insurance has brought a new product to market allowing businesses to protect digital property for a fraction of the previous cost.

  1. TACKLE CYBER CRIME:  Steve Marchant, who has developed Cyber Protect Insurance, at Marchant McKechnie in Annie Reed Road, Beverley.  Picture: Rob Stebbing.

    TACKLE CYBER CRIME: Steve Marchant, who has developed Cyber Protect Insurance, at Marchant McKechnie in Annie Reed Road, Beverley. Picture: Rob Stebbing.

The product was developed by directors Steve Marchant and Andrea Thompson.

Mr Marchant said: “I was with a commercial client about two years ago and he told me that he’d had a tip-off that certain members of staff were leaving him.

“He used digital forensic experts and certain members of staff were identified as leaking confidential information.”

The company that information was being leaked to was also identified and an out-of-court settlement was achieved.

But Mr Marchant discovered that the cost of using forensic experts could be as high as £50,000.

He said: “Once they find out about the cost, most people just sweep it under the carpet and hope it goes away.”

So the director decided to offer businesses an alternative to paying up front.

His new insurance product is called Cyber Protect.

In exchange for an annual premium that can be as low as £150, businesses can call out forensic experts if they are ever needed.

The new product uses a network of experts – often ex- policemen – who are all members of The Digital Forensic Alliance.

They are supplied by 14 companies across the UK.

Mr Marchant said: “Break-ins are diminishing fast because of alarms on doors and windows, so people are turning to other forms of crime, which inevitably involve computers.”

Since Cyber Protect launched at the start of the year, about 100 clients have signed up.

The product is offered by every commercial broker in Hull – and underwritten by major provider Zurich.

“We approached Zurich and put a report to them, and they decided to give it a go,” Mr Marchant said.

“It was a major achievement for us, because we believe it’s the first time for many years that a new insurance product has been offered on the market.

“Hull is an innovative area for the whole insurance industry.”

Mr Marchant’s plan is for Cyber Protect to become a standard part of commercial insurance.

“Our hope is that most businesses will accept this as a standard tool,” he said.

Cyber Protect is available to businesses across the UK.

Visit www.cyber-protect. co.uk to find out more.

Article source: http://www.thisishullandeastriding.co.uk/Let-s-digital-bid-protect-cyber-crime/story-15350718-detail/story.html

 Posted by at 12:56 pm
Feb 292012
 

For the last few days Naked Security has received enquiries from readers asking about a message that has been widely shared across Facebook.

Although the message isn’t related to computer security issues, it seems to have raised enough concern that it feels appropriate to discuss it here.

The message, which is sometimes distributed with an image of what appears to be pink-coloured crystalized methamphetamine, claims that children are being targeted with drugs that taste of strawberries.

Strawberry Quick warning

Strawberry Quick warning

…There is a drug going around the schools …It’s known as Strawberry Quick …or strawberry meth …it looks like pop rocks that kids eat, smells like strawberries … also comes in other flavors like chocolate, etc….. Please tell your children not to take candy from anyone even a classmate because this drug that looks like pop rocks is actually crystal meth rocked up with strawberry flavor can kill them :’( …PLEASE RE POST!!! So all parents are aware of this ……Thank You!

The Hoax Slayer website, however, points out that the messages are highly exaggerated and inaccurate and can be dated back as far as 2007.

So, if you are forwarding this message to your Facebook friends, you are perpetuating what seems to be a baseless scare rather than providing a useful warning.

Nonsense messages like this clog up social networks just like commercial spam, wasting time and hardly helping the signal:noise ratio.

Keep your wits about you and stay informed about the latest scams, hoaxes and malware attacks spreading fast across Facebook. One of the best ways to do that is to join the Sophos Facebook page, where more than 160,000 people regularly share information on threats and discuss the latest security news.

Article source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/nakedsecurity/~3/3R-7A_GALiM/

Feb 292012
 

It is widely anticipated that Apple will announce a new version of its iPad tablet computer in San Francisco on March 7th.

An invitation sent to journalists, inviting them to an event organised by Apple, has fueled speculation even further as it appears to show a close-up of someone using an iPad.

Teaser for iPad 3 launch event

Teaser for iPad 3 launch event

Could it be the new iPad with a much lusted for improved display and souped-up processor? Only time will tell..

Of course, one group that isn’t bothering to wait are the spammers and scammers who frequently tempt the unwary into clicking on their links, or completing their revenue-generating surveys, by offering the latest Apple gear.. for free.

And even though the iPad 3 doesn’t exist yet (and who can forget the iPhone 5 scams that all looked a bit silly once Apple actually announced the iPhone 4S instead?) we are seeing plenty of examples of Facebook pages and tweets that appear to be attempting to trick users into thinking they can get one for free.

Can you really get a free iPad 3 via Facebook or Twitter?

Can you really get a free iPad 3 via Facebook or Twitter?

As Apple hasn’t even announced the existence of an iPad 3, these posts and pages (some of which have existed for months) are clearly up to no good. It would be great to see social networks like Facebook and Twitter do more to clean up such clearly dubious activity, to better protect their userbase.

Chances are that we will see Apple announce an iPad 3 very soon. But don’t be duped into believing there’s an easy way to get one for free.

By the way, if you’re a Facebook user and want to keep up on the latest threats and security news I would recommend you join the Sophos Facebook page – where more than 160,000 people regularly discuss the latest attacks.

Article source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/nakedsecurity/~3/aTiwnbcgHEU/

Feb 292012
 

VeriSign trusted logo

VeriSign trusted logoA grey hat hacker has discovered cross-site scripting (XSS) holes in 25 UK online stores that are certified as safe by the likes of VeriSign, Visa, and MasterCard.

According to Softpedia, the XSS holes were found by a grey hat hacker named ‘Freedom’ who in the past has identified other such vulnerabilities in “some important websites.”

XSS vulnerabilities allow a wide spectrum of attack. These can include intercepting session cookies to steal sensitive information, including authentication credentials or billing info without the victim’s knowledge, or posting of messages with malicious payloads to a social network that then enable theft of victims’ session cookies and subsequent hijacking of sessions and impersonation of victims.

Here’s what Freedom had to say:

25 of these big sites all run the same script and it was not hard to find them all using a home made “Google dork”. They try to filter the search on the main pages but then when you search for something that is well not there it then allows you to search again and this one has no limit to characters and very lil filtering.

A person with 5 mins of looking at XSS could make these sites fall to the knees and well do alot of damage to the reputations of these sites.

Sophos researchers advise taking that one with a grain of salt. While XSS attacks can in fact cause quite a bit of damage, they vary so widely in implementation and collateral damage that it’s impossible to back up this type of kick-your-knees-off claim without a detailed, independent, expert review of the discovered attacks.

At any rate, Freedom handed over screenshots that Softpedia said prove the presence of security gaps in sites including House of Fraser, Jacamo, Fashion World, Premier Man, Williams and Brown, Marisota, Ambrose Wilson, Viva la Diva, Fifty Plus, and High and Mighty.

The affected websites bear security logos from VeriSign Trusted, Internet Shopping is Safe, Internet Delivery is Safe, Verified by Visa, and MasterCard SecureCode.

The Softpedia article didn’t mention that these sites have been hacked yet, mind you – just that the vulnerabilities exist.

As VeriSign’s Trusted Seal division is now owned by Symantec, it seemed somehow appropriate to plug in one URL, for The Brilliant Gift Shop, into Symantec’s Norton Safe Web link checker, which found no threats.

Norton Safe Web link checker results

Norton Safe Web link checker results

That doesn’t mean much of anything, however. As Sophos security expert Ross McKerchar noted, such scanning tools don’t discover all web vulnerabilities, and they’ll tell you in small print that they offer no such guarantee.

Upon looking these sites up, I also noted that many of the affected websites reported by Freedom have near-identical layouts. This points to the sites sharing some level of infrastructure, be it template, host or designer, meaning the weaknesses may be less than random.

Here’s Freedom’s take:

I have never in all my time found a script so poor been used by so many big brands.

But it tells me one thing they are all copy cats and think ohhh well if they use it, it must be secure and don’t get it checked over, just slap it online and let users use code that is well pants.

Softpedia also mentioned similar XSS flaws being evident in online shops including JD Williams, Heather Valley, Classic Confidence, Nightingales, Simply Yours, That’s My Style, Home Essentials, Oxendales, Naturally Close, House of Bath, Classic Detail, The Brilliant Gift Shop, Crazy Clearance, Feel Good Essentials, and Simply Be.

As Sophos’s Ross McKerchar noted, these seals can lull people into a false sense of security. It’s just one more instance of how we expect security to be a binary matter: a simple choice between a nice green tick for secure and a crimson X for “get out of here!”

Unfortunately, security seals don’t amount to red on one end and green on the other end of the safety spectrum. They really only stand for a rainbow of grey.

While the security seal services check that you’ve locked the front door, they’re no guarantee of, or substitute for, security best practices.

Article source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/nakedsecurity/~3/JmcHnPXE0vM/

Feb 292012
 

Chrome

ChromeGoogle is offering cash prizes totaling $1 million to hackers, plus a Chromebook, for those who successfully exploit its Chrome browser at the CanSecWest security conference next week.

According to a blog posting put up by the company’s security team on Monday, winnings from the so-called Pwnium contest will be meted out according to the following exploit severity:

$60,000 — “Full Chrome exploit”: Chrome/Win7 local OS user account persistence using only bugs in Chrome itself.

$40,000— “Partial Chrome exploit”: Chrome/Win7 local OS user account persistence using at least one bug in Chrome itself, plus other bugs. For example, a WebKit bug combined with a Windows sandbox bug.

$20,000 — “Consolation reward, Flash/Windows/other”: Chrome/Win7 local OS user account persistence that does not use bugs in Chrome. For example, bugs in one or more of Flash, Windows or a driver. These exploits are not specific to Chrome and will be a threat to users of any web browser. Although not specifically Chrome’s issue, we’ve decided to offer consolation prizes because these findings still help us toward our mission of making the entire web safer.

The Chrome-specific contest is a departure for Google.

Chrome

ChromeSince 2009, the company has bared Chrome’s neck to contestants of the conference’s Pwn2Own competition. In past contests, major browsers — Safari, Internet Explorer and Firefox — have all been pwned.

Chrome is the only browser eligible for Pwn2Own that has never been exploited. Last year, no one even tried.

As noted by Ars Technica, contestants cite the difficulty of bypassing Google’s security sandbox for their inability to figure out a successful exploit.

It might make sense for Google’s security team to gloat about that, but instead they’re smart enough to know how much they can learn from a successful exploit. Here’s how Chris Evans and Justin Schuh from the Google Chrome Security Team put it:

The aim of our sponsorship is simple: we have a big learning opportunity when we receive full end-to-end exploits. Not only can we fix the bugs, but by studying the vulnerability and exploit techniques we can enhance our mitigations, automated testing, and sandboxing. This enables us to better protect our users.

In fact, the reason Google’s split off from Pwn2Own and set up its own, Chrome-specific hacking contest this year is because of new changes in the Pwn2Own rules — changes that would hamper Google’s ability to get their hands on full, successful exploits.

Here’s what the security team had to say about the breakaway contest:

We decided to withdraw our sponsorship when we discovered that contestants are permitted to enter Pwn2Own without having to reveal full exploits (or even all of the bugs used!) to vendors. Full exploits have been handed over in previous years, but it’s an explicit non-requirement in this year’s contest, and that’s worrisome. We will therefore be running this alternative Chrome-specific reward program. It is designed to be attractive—not least because it stays aligned with user safety by requiring the full exploit to be submitted to us.

Google will issue multiple rewards per category up to the $1 million kitty, on a first-come, first-served basis.

The company won’t split winnings; nor will there be any “winner takes all.”

Google says each set of exploit bugs has to be reliable, fully functional end-to-end, disjoint (i.e., have no element in common), of critical impact, present in the latest versions and genuinely “zero-day” — in other words, they can’t have been previously reported or shared with third parties.

Exploits also have to be submitted to Google for judging before being shared anywhere else.

Google is guaranteeing to send non-Chrome bugs to the appropriate vendor immediately.

Chrome best, says study funded by Google

Chrome best, says study funded by GoogleI say kudos to Google.

They’ve done a lot of bragging about Chrome’s superior security compared to competitors’ browsers. The Google-funded, “Google Chrome is the BEST!” study comes to mind.

Pwn2Own has underscored that security. But it wouldn’t be smart for the company to rest on its laurels.

If it takes $1 million to set those laurels on fire, well, burn, baby, burn.

Article source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/nakedsecurity/~3/swo_EmWXNj8/

Feb 282012
 

Norton an Internet security company along with BestPlaces of Sperling a research group recently conducted a survey that shows Manchester (UK) as the most dangerous city with respect to its occurrences of malware attempts and Wi-Fi hotspots, published manchesterconfidential.co.uk dated February 21, 2012.

Additionally, the city has a large number of people who use computers, with access to the Internet, and also visits social-networking websites.

Moreover, during the survey, Norton measured the risk parameters as Internet-crime data obtained from bot-contaminated PCs; trials made in spreading of malware-infections; spamming of Internet Protocol addresses; and Web assaults; each in relation to any one city.

Intriguingly, the Internet-crime data levels in London City fluctuated around 25%, and albeit the city had a low level of Internet-crime data, its large utilization of the Internet, social-networking websites, and a high prevalence of computer usage increased the general risk parameters, thereby ranking it fifth among the top ten riskiest cities.

Astonishingly, Dublin was on No.6 alongside Paris, Stockholm, Amsterdam, Berlin, Rome, Bercelona and Milan.

Elaborating on the situation of Dublin, experts on Internet safety stated that it showed the percentage of smartphone and computer usage as comparatively lower than those of the remaining surveyed cities, while the number of cyber-crime trials and Wi-Fi hotspots was average.

Paradoxically, the results don’t necessarily portend evil about the situations in Dublin, Manchester as also the remaining listed cities, implying that those cities which had the maximum Internet-crime risk parameters didn’t essentially have greater incidences of malware-infection, said the experts. This, added the experts maybe due to consumers who exercised caution towards safeguarding themselves from online-criminals.

Meanwhile, Internet Safety Advocate Marian Merritt of Norton stated that as laptops, tablets, and smart-phones exploded over the recent years along with more number of social networks and software programs, there was a continuous morphing of offline and online lives of the public in manners which didn’t ever happen before. And though consequently, several favorable aspects emerged from the analysis, the point highlighted was the potentially danger prone parameters that were experienced whenever people connected to the Internet, she added. Irishtimes.com published this on February 21, 2012.

» SPAMfighter News – 28-02-2012

Article source: http://www.spamfighter.com/News-17466-Manchester-Ranked-No1-Among-Most-Dangerous-European-Online-Cities.htm

 Posted by at 6:54 pm
Feb 282012
 

Searching on Twitter

Searching on TwitterDid you think Twitter was just for fun? That your tweets were just harmless irrelevant mutterings into the electronic ether?

You’re wrong. You’re taking part in a massive market-research study.

The news, which may surprise some, is that Twitter has found another way to monetise its service, having partnered with a firm which will make it simple for market researchers working for big companies to search and analyse the last two years of your Twitter updates.

Regular Twitter users can only search the site for messages posted in the last seven days or so, but Twitter has granted DataSift access to the full Twitter Firehose, allowing the UK-based firm to monitor and analyse tweets from the last 24 months, and even record sentiments and the location of Twitter users.

As the BBC reports today, DataSift is the first company in the world to offer their business customers access to potentially valuable information.

DataSift

DataSiftWhat’s that? You thought that tweets you posted months ago had vanished like your breath on a cold day, or were simply hidden away so deeply and awkwardly on the Twitter website that they would be too difficult to uncover?

Think again.

If you aren’t comfortable with firms being able to mine your past tweets – and potentially gather information about you – you may wish to delete your old postings and think more carefully about what you share publicly on the internet in future.

Furthermore, if you haven’t already done so, you may also wish to change your Twitter account settings to prevent the site from sharing your physical location when you post a tweet. Twitter offers the ability to delete location information from tweets you have made in the past.

Tweet location setting

Tweet location setting

Users who have set “up “private” accounts on Twitter (rather than the more normal “public” accounts) are not included in the site’s accessible archive of old tweets, and so can not be shared with market research firms.

Remember this – whether you use Twitter, LinkedIn, Facebook or indeed any other website – if you don’t want it to become public, don’t post it on the internet.

Article source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/nakedsecurity/~3/r2fOWBUpPyY/