Jul 312011
 

The international hunt for the LulzSec computer hackers linked to cyber attacks on police and government websites in the UK and US has led to the arrest of an 18-year-old man in Shetland.

The Metropolitan police’s e-crime unit said the man used the online nickname Topiary, the alias of the group’s main spokesman.

This was the first arrest linked to LulzSec and the broader hacking collective Anonymous in which the police have immediately identified the online identity of the suspect arrested. Police also searched a house in Lincolnshire and interviewed a 17-year-old man under caution, though no arrest was made.

The arrest of Topiary is the third made in the UK in the search for members of the group, following that of Ryan Cleary, in Essex, in June, and the arrest and release in London last week of a 16-year-old known online as Tflow. The apparent ringleader of the group, known online as Sabu, remains at large.

LulzSec claims to have carried out attacks on a number of sites, including the Sun last week when it redirected readers to a fake story claiming Rupert Murdoch was dead, and others during May and June including attacks on the UK’s Serious Organised Crime Agency, an FBI-affiliated site, the US Congress, and Sony’s European network.

“Topiary” was on Wednesday being transported to London for interview. The main Twitter account connected to LulzSec, which has more than 340,000 followers and which Topiary is alleged to control, fell silent shortly before midday on Wednesday. Topiary’s own twitter feed, @atopiary, was wiped clear on Friday, save for one tweet reading: “You cannot arrest an idea.”

Police in the UK and US have been rounding up suspected members of LulzSec, and those who in January participated in attacks on the payments site PayPal as part of the Anonymous hacking collective. Last week the FBI made 16 arrests of alleged participants in the attacks, and it is believed to have a list of 1,000 computer addresses it is targeting.

On Wednesday members of Anonymous and LulzSec staged a peaceful protest against PayPal for its refusal to allow payments to WikiLeaks by closing their PayPal accounts.

The arrest in Shetland was carried out by the Met’s e-crime unit along with the Scottish Crime and Drug Enforcement Agency (SCDEA) and Lincolnshire police.

The unnamed 16-year-old man from south London was arrested and released without charge on bail last week. He is due to return for further questioning in August.

Cleary is to appear before a London court on 30 August charged with a number of attacks on websites. Cleary was charged with five offences under the Criminal Law and Computer Misuse Acts, including an alleged attack on Soca’s website.

Earlier this week the group claimed to have broken into websites belonging to Italy’s police cybercrime unit and Nato. Nato said it was investigating the claims. The group also claims to have a large number of emails collected from an attack on News International servers.

Rival hackers regularly attempt to expose members of Lulzsec’s inner team by publishing suspected details of their real identities, a process known as “doxing”. Several such efforts made to unmask Topiary in June suggested he may be located in the UK or Ireland, though someone apparently acting as Topiary denied these in chat channels.

Contacts within Anonymous suggest Topiary has not been seen online for several days.

Article source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2011/jul/27/lulzsec-hacking-suspect-topiary-arrested

 Posted by at 8:31 pm
Jul 312011
 

A new scam has spread quickly across Facebook this weekend, pretending to be a link to a TV news report about an alleged Facebook killer.

Here’s a typical message that has been seen spreading between social networking users:
Facebook Killer

(BREAKING NEWS) Facebook-Killer
[LINK]
07-29-2011 – News гepoгts of a maп they are calling the ‘Facebook Killer’ have ƍone ramрant, he has claimed 9 lives in the United States so far that we ᴋnow

Other variants of the scam read:

(CNN) The Facebook-Killer
[LINK]
‎07-29-2011 – News reporтs of a man tһey are calling tһe ‘Facebook Killer’ have ɡone rampant, he hаs claimed 9 lives in tһe Uniтed Sтaтes so far thαt we know ..

Clicking on one of the links will take you, not to a genuine TV news report from the likes of CNN, but to a fake YouTube webpage instead, where you are tricked into sharing the link further with your online friends.

Facebook Killer

For those who haven’t learned the scammers’ trick yet, “Jaa” is Finnish for “Share”. If you click the button, you’re sharing the link with your friends *before* you have even seen the supposed video.

What’s particularly interesting to me though is that the webpage appears to have attempted to work out where I am in the world, in an attempt to make the video more interesting to me. Through GEO-IP lookup techniques it has attempted to work out where in the world I am – and so is presenting (in my case) a video which claims the serial killer is in the British city of Salisbury.

Furthermore, if you look down the page you’ll see supposed comments left by other viewers of the video including one which says:

This is UNREAL! I live in Salisbury

Again, however, this is a trick by the scammers. If you look at the webpage’s code you will see that it substitutes the name of the city into the comments as well.

Facebook Killer

But imagine that you came to this page without your skeptical hat on. What would happen if you did click twice to “prove” that you were over 13 years old, and share the link with your friends?

Well, you would be taken to what is commonly termed as a survey scam. These are surveys, or competitions, which trick you into handing over your personal information and either earn the scammers commission or require you to sign-up for an expensive premium rate service.

Facebook Killer

Don’t be tricked into clicking on such links and sharing them with your online friends – you’re only making life more profitable for scammers who earn a crust from creating new spam campaigns on social networks.

If you got hit by this scam, make sure you have removed the entries from your news feed (to stop them being shared amongst your friends), marking them as spam if you like, and check your profile does not have any unwanted “Likes” under your “Likes and interests”.

If you use Facebook and want to get an early warning about the latest attacks, I strongly recommend you join the Sophos Facebook page where we have a thriving community of over 100,000 people.

Article source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/nakedsecurity/~3/NUoN1V8CPYs/

Jul 312011
 

Sexy ladyDo you take enough care over who you make your Facebook friend?

A Belgian supermarket manager learnt a lesson the hard way, after he struck up a friendship with a woman called “Katrien Van Loo” on Facebook.

Little did he know, that when she invited him to a dinner date at her apartment, something else entirely was planned.

As you can see in the following video, the unnamed supermarket manager didn’t find a sexy Facebook admirer, but instead two men who overpowered him, and left him gagged and blindfolded.


(Enjoy this video? Check out more on the SophosLabs YouTube channel and subscribe if you like.)

Before the night was out, a third man had broken into the supermarket and made off with an unspecified amount of money from the store’s safe.

More information about the crime can be found on the Belgian police website. If you recognise the men caught on the CCTV footage, or have any additional information then call the toll-free hotline on 0800 / 30.30.0.

If you use Facebook and want to get an early warning about the latest threats, I strongly recommend you join the Sophos Facebook page where we have a thriving community of over 100,000 people.

Hat-tip: Trend Micro’s Rik Ferguson via The Register.

Article source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/nakedsecurity/~3/zDmiUdZu14Y/

Jul 312011
 

Yell, ShetlandBritish police have tonight named the teenager they arrested in Shetland last week, in relation to the LulzSec and Anonymous hacking groups.

Jake Davis, 18, will appear in court on Monday charged with five offences including unauthorised computer access and conspiracy to carry out a DDoS (distributed denial-of-service) attack against the SOCA website.

(SOCA is the UK’s Serious Organised Crime Agency – the very group that investigates serious cybercrime in Great Britain. You can just imagine how they must have felt when cybercriminals launched an attack against their website which made it inaccessible).

Here is the full list of the charges against Jake Davis:

  • Unauthorised access to a computer system, contrary to Section 3 of the Computer Misuse Act 1990;

  • Encouraging / assisting offences, contrary to S46 of the Serious Crime Act 2007;

  • Conspiracy with others to carry out a Distributed Denial of Service Attack on the website of the Serious and Organised Crime Agency contrary to S1 Criminal Law Act 1977

  • Conspiracy to commit offences of section 3 Computer Misuse Act 1990, contrary to S1 Criminal Law Act 1977

  • Conspiracy between the defendant and others to commit offences of section 3 Computer Misuse Act 1990 contrary to S1 Criminal Law Act 1977.

Davis, reportedly an avid online chess player, was arrested on Yell, one of the northern isles of Shetland. Frankly, it’s hard to imagine a more remote place in the British Isles to be.

Although there have been plenty of internet rumours speculating that the police might have been tricked by the hackers into arresting the wrong person, the authorities have been confident since Davis’s arrest that he was the one they believed to be “Topiary”.

A few days before Davis’s arrest, Topiary’s Twitter account was strangely wiped and replaced with a single message:

“You cannot arrest an idea”

You cannot arrest an idea

Both Topiary and LulzSec’s Twitter accounts have remained silent since Davis’s arrest.

We will publish more information as it becomes available, or follow me on Twitter for updates.

Article source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/nakedsecurity/~3/e95BBi-2Nsk/

Jul 312011
 

BANGALORE: The cyber crime police, after a two-year investigation, have proved that a Mumbai mafia is phishing the IT city. They have arrested three persons in connection with three separate incidents.

They have also proved that the ‘phishing mafia’ is not directly using their e-accounts but is using accounts of others on commission basis.

A CID official of the SP’s rank said that this is a dangerous trend because many such ‘phishing cases’ reported in Bangalore are being traced to Mumbai. “We suspect there could be a mafia which runs anti-social activities after availing money by doing these types of hi tech-robbery,” he added.

The Cyber Crime Police Station (CCPS) registered around 100 such phishing cases in 2009, but for them it is very difficult to trace the accused as they are using benami bank accounts, sources said. Now the CCPS has succeeded in arresting three persons, all from Mumbai in connection with some cases. The police also said that the accused are graduates with the knowledge of computer. The investigations are still on.

Case 1 The cyber police arrested one Abdul Khan Khair (28) from Halav Pool Kurla West Mumbai on Wednesday.

Exactly two years ago, (July 25, 2009) he did phishing on behalf of one Feroze of Rs 1 lakh. He transferred Rs 1 Lakh (Rs 50,000 twice) from the ICICI account of one IT professional Abhishek Malviya, a native of Itarsi, Madhya Pradesh. Malviya, after checking with the ICICI bank, got to know that the money was transferred to the accounts of Atul Javed Khan and Manojkumar Solanki.

Police suspect that the two names are benami and the accused who transferred the money from Malviya’s account through internet banking is Abdul Khan Khair.

Khan told the interrogators that he did this internet fraud as suggested by one Feroze for availing commission amount from the latter, police detailed.

Case 2 The CCPS sleuths arrested one Syed Mohemmed Kafil (27) of Naupada, Bandra West of Maharastra. He was arrested in a case on July 17 which was registered on August 31 of 2009 by an IT professional Babuprasad Chakravarty, an employee with a BPO run by Infosys company. An amount of Rs 30,000 from his ICICI savings bank account was transferred to another account.

When he checked with the bank, they told the money was transferred to an account at Mumbai.

The cyber police have now traced the accused to Mumbai and arrested him, police said.

Case 3 Pratik (25) was arrested from his native Bhayandar of Mumbai on July 17. He had transferred Rs 75,000 through ‘phishing’ from the ICICI account of BS Gurudev, an employee with an IT firm in Indiranagar on August 20, 2009. The money was transferred four times from his account to the account of the accused on the same day, police said.

(Follow IBNLive.com on Facebook and on Twitter<!– , and on Google+ –> for updates that you can share with your friends.)




Article source: http://ibnlive.in.com/news/city-phishing-cases-traced-to-mumbai/171762-60-119.html

 Posted by at 8:28 am

New Trojan found

 Anti-Virus  Comments Off
Jul 312011
 

The word Trojan has many meanings, and when it is used without qualification in headlines, it’s hard to know which one is meant.

An olden-day Trojan was an inhabitant of the ancient city of Troy, near modern Çanakkale in Turkey, on the Anatolian side of the Dardanelles.

The word is also short for Trojan horse. Once, this meant the dissembling wooden gift which tricked those same Trojans into defeat in Virgil’s epic Latin poem The Aeneid; today, it refers to the sort of dodgy software which tricks you into giving up control of your PC.

In Australia, if you want to renovate your house, you’ll need power tools, and they might be Trojans; in the USA, if you get lucky, you’ll need a condom, and you might roll out a different sort of Trojan.

(Since the ancient Trojans are best remembered for puncturing a hole in their own defences – to admit the aforementioned wooden horse – thus allowing the enemy to spill into their city and destroy it, I’ve never quite understood the metaphor in branding condoms as ‘Trojans’. Perhaps that’s why I’m not in marketing.)

But there’s another sort of Trojan, namely an asteroid or small satellite which shares its orbit with a planet or larger satellite.

This sort of Trojan makes fascinating study, because it involves dealing with the interaction of three celestial objects. The so-called three-body problem is a special case of the n-body problem, first expounded by Sir Isaac Newton in his 1687 book known as Principia, in which he also introduced the Law of Universal Gravitation.

Obviously, the zero-body and one-body problems are trivial and uninteresting. And it turns out that the mathematics for the two-body problem – for example, working with the sun and the earth, or the earth and the moon – is fairly straightforward. Sir Isaac sorted things out for n=2 back in the 17th century.

It seems obvious that the mathematics ought quickly to get hairy as n increases. When n=20, for example, you’d expect a jolly spicy set of equations. But it might be a surprise to learn that things get almost insurpassably tough right at once. As Wikipedia rather drily remarks, “for n ≥ 3 very little is known about the n-body problem.”

What we do know, thanks to the brilliant 18th century mathematician Joseph-Louis Lagrange, is that there are “five positions in an orbital configuration where a small object affected only by gravity can theoretically be stationary relative to two larger objects”.

To this day, they are called Lagrange points, denoted by L1 to L5.

And that’s where our brand-new Trojan comes in.

Discovered in October 2010, this celestial body has now been confirmed as the very first astronomical Trojan known to orbit along with Earth.

The Trojan loops, well, quite loopily, around L4, which itself loops around the sun, 60 degrees ahead of our Earth-bound trajectory.

The Trojan, which is estimated to be about 300m across, therefore precedes us round the sun. Fortunately, it maintains a reliable, healthy and, most importantly, consistent distance from our planet.

That’s what makes it harmless: it’s locked into orbit with us, rather than on any sort of collision course. At least for now.

And it’s important because Earth Trojans – of which there may be many – are hard to find. Trojans of Mars, Jupiter and Neptune are known; so are Trojans of Saturn’s moons. But Earth Trojans circle mostly in our daylight sky, making them really tricky to spot.

But where, I’m sure you are now dying to ask, is the link to computer security, and to computer Trojans?

Here you go.

Astronomers, like malware researchers, deal with huge numbers of new discoveries. Naming something if it’s one of the very first examples of its type is one thing. Reliably naming objects by the million is quite another.

For this reason, malware researchers have shifted from catchy names like Jerusalem, Tremor and Grand Old Duke of York (don’t ask – that one’s a story in its own right) to taxonomic dullnesses such as Troj/FakeAV-DB and Mal/ObfJS-E.

Catchy names now appear only occasionally for really well-known viruses, such as Conficker and Stuxnet.

Astronomers, unsurprisingly, have a similar approach, so I’m sorry to have to tell you that this super-cool, first-of-its-kind, Earth Trojan is unmajestically known simply as 2010 TK7.

If you’ve got a cooler name, please leave a comment and let us know. We’ll pass your suggestions on to the astronomical powers-that-be.

And be sure to check out the animations which yielded the above 2010 TK7 diagram.

Article source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/nakedsecurity/~3/CFl04vz7G1E/

Jul 312011
 

Just over two years ago, a triumvirate of security researchers – Charlie Miller, Alex Sotirov, and Dino Dai Zovi – announced what they hoped would become an internet meme: “No more free bugs.”

Their argument was that non-aligned security researchers who find security-related bugs ought to be paid for disclosing them to the relevant vendor. No money, no report.

At first blush, this sounds rather mercenary. But it isn’t, provided that it only works that way round – no money, no report. Run the concept the other way about, of course (pay me or else) and it’s not only immoral but almost certainly a matter of demanding money with menaces. That’s better known as blackmail, extortion or standover, and it’s illegal.

You can also argue that vendors, especially of web-based services, who offer to pay a reasonable fee for bugs – and why limit bug-finding just to security flaws? – are more likely to attract the goodwill and bug-hunting skills of independent researchers and observant home users. By doing so, they will therefore end up with better-quality products and services than those vendors who don’t.

(Computer science luminary, high priest of the analysis of algorithms, pipe-organ buff, funky Biblical scholar and all-round Good Guy, Donald Knuth – you’ve either heard of him or are about to go and read up about him – famously pays a bounty for any and all errors, no matter how small, found in his publications.

Spelling mistakes, factual errors, historical inaccuracies, incorrect index entries: all qualify for a reward of at least $2.56. That’s 100 hexadecimal cents.)

Facebook is the most recent company to come to the bug-bounty party, officially announcing recently that “to show our appreciation for our security researchers, we offer a monetary bounty for certain qualifying security bugs.”

There’s been general approval of this step, though a few observers have claimed that Facebook’s bounty is a bit on the cheap side. Google, say the Facebook detractors, offers US$3113.70 for bugs, and Mozilla US$3000, compared to Facebook’s typical starting bounty of US$500.

In fact, the detractors are wrong. Google’s offer to start paying for for web application bugs explicitly opens the bidding, just like Facebook, at US$500.

Google’s Chromium bug bounty also started at US$500, a figure Google says it copied from Mozilla. The higher figures are for more serious bugs – something Facebook also says it will pay extra for.

So Facebook has definitely taken a step in the right direction here, and its “budget price” for bugs matches what other industry giants are offering. Nice one, Facebook.

Are there any downsides?

The bad news is that Facebook is only interested in security reports to do with explicit web coding flaws, such as XSS (cross-site scripting) bugs or code injection faults. Bugs or shortcomings in the company’s general attitude to security don’t count.

Sadly, that means you can’t grab yourself a quick $1500 by simply sending in Naked Security’s Three Simple Steps To Better Facebook Security from our open letter earlier in the year. If you missed them back then, they were:

* Privacy by default.
* Vetted application developers.
* HTTPS for everything.

In fact, Facebook won’t pay for bugs in third-party applications at all, even though those applications carry an implicit endorsement by knitting themselves into the fabric of Facebook itself, and even though Facebook still doesn’t have a decent application vetting process.

That’s a pity.

So too is the verbiage in Facebook’s Responsible Disclosure Policy. You might expect that this would merely limit bug payouts to people who give Facebook time to fix the bugs before they announce them to the world.

It does, but also adds a rather chilling rider:

If you give us a reasonable time to respond to your report before making any information public and make a good faith effort to avoid privacy violations, destruction of data and interruption or degradation of our service during your research, we will not bring any lawsuit against you or ask law enforcement to investigate you.

Facebook, please change both your sentiment and your wording!

You’re entitled to bring a lawsuit against anyone you think you have a case against, and you’re entitled (some would say morally obliged) to call in law enforcement whenever you think you’ve got a crime to report. So you don’t need to reiterate your statutory rights and obligations whilst at the very same time trying to sell us on the idea that you’re out “to show appreciation for security researchers.”

If you want to wave the threat of lawsuits and of calling the cops, why not do so against the huge number of scammers who already plague your social network?

Please don’t write what sounds eerily close to a threat to the very security researchers you want to get working on your behalf!

Article source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/nakedsecurity/~3/Fn-Jn3CB1Dw/

Jul 312011
 


Sad development for digital piracy lovers in the country – US officials have warned that any UK based website, if found guilty of promoting piracy, their owners will eventually be extradited to America. Worse still, the new policy will be applied irrespective of whether or not the websites in question have any connection to the US.

The new policy adopted by the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agency, US, will empower it to go legal against any foreign based website if they are caught messing around with the country’s copyright laws.

Erik Barnett, the assistant deputy director of the agency emphasised on the scope of the new policy by saying that all “.com” or “.net” websites would find themselves in trouble if suspected of spreading pirated versions of any US movies, TV or other forms of media.

“By definition, almost all copyright infringement and trademark violation is transnational. There’s very little purely domestic intellectual property theft,” Mr. Barnett stated, the Guardian reports.

“The jurisdiction we have over these sites right now really is the use of the domain name registry system in the United States. That’s the key,” he added.

Article source: http://www.itproportal.com/2011/07/04/uk-piracy-offenders-to-be-extradited-to-america/

 Posted by at 8:28 am